From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muntaz v. Fairygodboss Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 25, 2022
21-CV-9386 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. May. 25, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-9386 (RA)

05-25-2022

RIAASA MUNTAZ, Plaintiff, v. FAIRYGODBOSS INC, ROMY NEWMAN, MAURA BRADLEY, and DANNA HENDRICKSON, Defendants.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

On December 29, 2021, Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint on April 29, 2022. Per Rule 4(C) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, “[i]f the plaintiff amends its pleading, the defendant must, within fourteen days of service of the amended complaint: (1) file an answer; (2) file a new motion to dismiss; or (3) submit a letter to the Court and the plaintiff stating that it relies on the previously filed motion to dismiss.” To date, the Court has received no such submission. Defendants shall comply with Rule 4(C) by no later than June 8, 2022.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Muntaz v. Fairygodboss Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 25, 2022
21-CV-9386 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. May. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Muntaz v. Fairygodboss Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RIAASA MUNTAZ, Plaintiff, v. FAIRYGODBOSS INC, ROMY NEWMAN, MAURA BRADLEY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 25, 2022

Citations

21-CV-9386 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. May. 25, 2022)