From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munson S.S. Lines v. Newman

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 25, 1928
24 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1928)

Summary

taking judicial notice that distance between two cities was “more than 100 miles”

Summary of this case from Donegan v. The Toro Co.

Opinion

No. 5129.

February 25, 1928.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; William I. Grubb, Judge.

Suit in admiralty by Arthur Newman against the Munson Steamship Lines. Decree for libelant, and respondent appeals. Affirmed.

Crate D. Bowen, of Miami, Fla. (L.S. Julian and Shutts Bowen, all of Miami, Fla., on the brief), for appellant.

Robt. L. Shipp, of Miami, Fla. (Shipp, Evans Kline, of Miami, Fla., on the brief); for appellee.

Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from a decree in admiralty awarding damages for a personal injury sustained by appellee while he was employed as longshoreman and engaged in unloading cargo. A piece of plank used as dunnage was unsound, and broke under appellee's weight, causing him to lose his balance, with the result that a box of freight which he was lifting fell on him and injured him.

The negligence charged in the libel was the failure to use reasonable care to provide a safe place for the stevedore and his longshoremen to work. It is insisted on this appeal that the failure to use sound boards for dunnage was the fault of the stevedore who loaded the ship, and that the owners are not chargeable with negligence. It is the duty of the ship initially to exercise due diligence to furnish the stevedore with a safe place to work, and she cannot escape liability by showing that a competent stevedore was employed at the loading port when the accident occurs in unloading.

Objection was made to the deposition taken at Miami for use in the trial at Jacksonville. The deposition was taken under section 865 of the Revised Statutes (28 USCA § 641), on the ground that the witness was at a greater distance than 100 miles from the place where the court was sitting. There is nothing in the objection, as this court will take judicial notice that the distance between the cities named is more than 100 miles.

The decree is affirmed.


Summaries of

Munson S.S. Lines v. Newman

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 25, 1928
24 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1928)

taking judicial notice that distance between two cities was “more than 100 miles”

Summary of this case from Donegan v. The Toro Co.

taking judicial notice of the distance between cities

Summary of this case from Taylor v. Bayou Dorcheat Corr. Ctr.

taking judicial notice of distance between cities

Summary of this case from Sunday v. Belleair Vill., Ltd.

taking judicial notice of distance between cities

Summary of this case from Sunday v. Belleair Vill., Ltd.

taking judicial notice of distance between cities

Summary of this case from Price v. Orlando Health, Inc.

taking judicial notice of distance between cities

Summary of this case from Kennedy v. Cape Siesta Motel, LLC

taking judicial notice of distance between cities

Summary of this case from Longhini v. J.U.T.A., Inc.

taking judicial notice of distance between two cities

Summary of this case from Cortez v. Brad Drake Constr., LLC

taking judicial notice of the distance between two cities

Summary of this case from Jones v. City of Plantation Police Dep't
Case details for

Munson S.S. Lines v. Newman

Case Details

Full title:MUNSON S.S. LINES v. NEWMAN

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 25, 1928

Citations

24 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1928)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Etna

Grays Harbor Stevedore Co. v. Fountain, 9 Cir., 5 F.2d 385; The Chicago, D.C., 156 F. 374. It is likewise…

Taylor v. Bayou Dorcheat Corr. Ctr.

(“We may, of course, take judicial notice of geography.”); Munson S.S. Lines v. Newman, 24 F.2d 416, 417 (5th…