Opinion
2:20-cv-01412-GMN-BNW
11-30-2022
JONATHAN MUNOZ, Plaintiff, v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge United States District Court
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 18), of United States Magistrate Judge Brenda N. Weksler, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff Jonathan Munoz's (“Plaintiff's”) Third Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 17), for failure to amend.
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's R&R where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).
Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF No. 18) (setting a March 8, 2022, deadline for objections). In addition, Plaintiff had until January 31, 2022, to file his fourth amended complaint to avoid dismissal but did not do so. (See Order 4:11-12, ECF No. 16).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 18), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 17), is dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is instructed to close the case.