From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munoz v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 9, 2024
No. 05-24-00077-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2024)

Opinion

05-24-00077-CR

02-09-2024

MICHAEL THOMAS MUNOZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 437th Judicial District Court Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021CR9362

ORDER

DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE

The clerk's record February 1, 2024, states that volume 2 is "SEALED," but there is no order sealing that volume of the clerk's record.

Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.10(g) provides, "Sealed portions of the clerk's and reporter's records should be clearly marked and separated from unsealed portions and tendered as separate records, whether in paper form or electronic form." TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). The rule also provides, "If a court orders material sealed, . . . the court's sealing order must be . . . the first document that appears if filed in electronic form." Id. The clerk's record does not meet the requirements of Rule 9.10(g) because there is no court's sealing order in that record.

We STRIKE volume two of the clerk's record filed February 1, 2024.

We ORDER the trial court to determine whether any of the documents in volume two of the clerk's record contain sensitive or confidential data and should be subject to a sealing order. The trial court shall identify which documents, if any, should be subject to a sealing order; the trial court shall sign a sealing order sealing those documents the trial court found should be subject to a sealing order; and the trial court shall notify the district clerk of the sealing order or that no documents are subject to a sealing order within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

If the trial court determines that none of the documents should be subject to a sealing order, then the district clerk shall transmit volume two of the clerk's record to this Court in an unsealed volume of the clerk's record without a sealing order and without the word "SEALED" on the cover. If the trial court determines that some or all of the documents should be subject to a sealing order, then the district clerk shall transmit those documents in a sealed volume of the clerk's record to this Court with the sealing order as the first document in the sealed volume of the clerk's record; and the district clerk shall transmit any remaining unsealed documents in a separate unsealed supplemental clerk's record without a sealing order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). The new volume 2 of the clerk's record and any unsealed supplemental clerk's record shall be filed with this Court within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of the trial court's sealing order or notice of no sealing order and no later than FORTY-FIVE DAYS after the date of this order.

This appeal is ABATED for the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal will be reinstated when volume 2 of the clerk's record is refiled and any supplemental clerk's record is filed or at such other time as the Court deems proper.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order to the Honorable Joel Perez, Presiding Judge, 437th District Court; Gloria Martinez, Bexar County District Clerk; and counsel for all parties.


Summaries of

Munoz v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 9, 2024
No. 05-24-00077-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Munoz v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL THOMAS MUNOZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Feb 9, 2024

Citations

No. 05-24-00077-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2024)