From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munoz v. Pickeet

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 11, 2021
2:19-cv-10439-MWF (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-10439-MWF (GJS)

01-11-2021

JOSE LUIS MUNOZ, Petitioner v. J. PICKEET, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 21, “Report”], Petitioner's Objections to the Report [Dkt. 25], and Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability [Dkt. 24]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: the Petition is DENIED; and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Munoz v. Pickeet

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 11, 2021
2:19-cv-10439-MWF (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Munoz v. Pickeet

Case Details

Full title:JOSE LUIS MUNOZ, Petitioner v. J. PICKEET, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 11, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-10439-MWF (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2021)