Opinion
1:21-cv-01026-AWI-HBK
12-30-2021
CARLOS MUNOZ, Plaintiff, v. PETERSON RECOVERY GROUP; WESTERN RECOVERY, Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(DOC. NO. 6)
Plaintiff Carlos Munoz proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this action against Peterson Recovery Group and Western Recovery. Doc. No. 1. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302.
On November 29, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued a findings and recommendations that recommended for the dismissal of the case without prejudice because of a lack of jurisdiction, failure to state a claim, and failure to prosecute. Doc. No. 6. The findings and recommendations that were served on Plaintiff contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen days. Id. at 1, 6. Plaintiff has not filed an objection and the time to do so has expired.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
ORDER
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 6) that were issued on November 29, 2021, are ADOPTED in full and this case is DISMISSED; and
2. The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE any pending motions, ENTER judgment against Plaintiff, and CLOSE this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.