From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munoz v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 30, 2021
2:21-cv-1138 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1138 AC P

06-30-2021

ELIAS IVAN MUNOZ, Petitioner, v. PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Los Angeles County Superior Court. While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Los Angeles County. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 499 n.15 (1973); 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and

2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.


Summaries of

Munoz v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 30, 2021
2:21-cv-1138 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Munoz v. Covello

Case Details

Full title:ELIAS IVAN MUNOZ, Petitioner, v. PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1138 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2021)