From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 6, 1994
634 So. 2d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 94-0330.

April 6, 1994.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Edward Rodgers, Judge.

Bernard F. Daley, Jr., Daley Associates, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William A. Spillias, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


In this appeal of the trial court's order summarily denying appellant's rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief, the state has agreed that if the motion was timely filed, the order denying the motion should be reversed. We conclude that the 3.850 motion was timely filed. See Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Clements, 148 Fla. 175, 3 So.2d 865 (Fla. 1941); Cook v. Walgreen Co., 399 So.2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or attachment of portions of the record conclusively showing that appellant is not entitled to relief.

GUNTHER, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Munn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 6, 1994
634 So. 2d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Munn v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MUNN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 6, 1994

Citations

634 So. 2d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)