Munn v. McWhite

3 Citing cases

  1. Lyles v. Fellers

    131 S.C. 387 (S.C. 1925)   Cited 2 times

    Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals. Mr. James S. Verner, for appellant, cites: Action oftrespass based on possession: 91 S.C. 231; 97 S.C. 130; 86 S.C. 358; 91 S.C. 464; 95 S.C. 328; 105 S.C. 339. Effect given to judgment roll offered in evidence: 116 S.C. 11; 12 S.C. 153; 24 S.C. 355. Latent ambiguity indeed question for the jury: 92 S.C. 65; 2 Strob., 156; 1 Strob., 143; 1 Rich., 135; 22 S.C. 507; 44 S.C. 548; 67 S.C. 18; 80 S.C. 472; 61 S.C. 287; 118 S.C. 492; 26 S.C. 160; 566. Older of two deeds of same grantor takesprecedence: 71 S.C. 327; 3 Rich., 101; 5 Rich., 267; 33 S.C. 184; 14 S.C. 550; 17 S.C. 139. Defendant mustshow title in himself: 91 S.C. 234; 105 S.C. 338; 110 S.C. 478; 97 S.C. 132. Title in issue in action of trespass: 114 S.C. 380. Adverse possession question forthe jury: 110 S.C. 479; 105 S.C. 329, 341; 107 S.C. 204; 82 S.C. 215; 39 Ann. Cas., 911 note. Reference todocument not evidence of it: 37 S.C. 73; 12 S.C. 144; 58 S.C. 382. Burden of proof on claimant of realty: 71 S.C. 322; 33 S.C. 19. Messrs. Weston Aycock and U.L. Rast, for respondent, cite: Tracing title to common source: 123 S.C. 67. Possession presumed to follow legal title; how rebutted: 103 S.C. 84; 102 S.C. 395; 71 S.C. 322; 2 Strob. Eq., 113; Code of Proc., 1922, Sec. 320. Plaintiff to provetitle: 114 S.C. 381; 97 S.C. 132. Boundaries of landclaimed under color of title: 59 S.C. 115; 2 C.J., 250. Trespass cannot ripen into good

  2. Casualty Co. v. Manufacturing Co.

    93 S.C. 406 (S.C. 1913)   Cited 21 times

    Messrs. Otts Dobson, for appellant, cite: No ambiguityin contract: 77 S.C. 92; 8 Gray 427; 134 S.W. 1164; 80 At. 217; 141 S.W. 319; and none alleged: 108 S.W. 829. Agent cannot say what insuring clause covers: 180 U.S. 308; and evidence on that is incompetent: 56 N.E. 134; 84 N.Y.S. 958; 26 S.C. 258; 9 Cyc. 591; 95 Fed. 625; 84 S.W. 1041; 63 N.E. 110; 28 So. 136; 8 N.W. 67; 9 Cyc. 590; 55 N.E. 292; 180 U.S. 132; 151 U.S. 452; 136 U.S. 287; 85 N.E. 1006; 98 P. 1075; 120 Fed. 916; 171 U.S. 688; 2 Ont. 89; 78 At. 225; 43 Am. D. 428; 7 Am. R. 638; 16 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1182-3, 1186. Mr. J.C. Jeffries, contra, cites: How ambiguity mayappear: 3 McC. 269; 1 McC. 258; 1 Rich. Eq. 426; 80 S.C. 472; 17 Cyc. 682; 54 L.R.A. 673. Messrs. Nicholls Nicholls cite: Minds of contractingparties did not meet: 2 H. C. 906; 31 S.C. 53. Anambiguity may be explained by parol: 29 (L. Ed.) U.S. 864; 64 S.C. 520; 50 S.C. 169; 19 Wall. 48.

  3. Fertilizer Co. v. Railway

    83 S.C. 530 (S.C. 1909)   Cited 16 times
    In Peoples Oil Fertilizer Co. v. C. W.C. Ry. Co., 83 S.C. 530, 65 S.E., 733, 734, the plaintiff had received considerable amounts from insurance companies under contracts covering loss by fire, but the plaintiff claimed substantial loss in excess of the aggregate amount received from the insurance companies.

    Mr. Simpson cites: Should action have been sustained asbrought? Code of Proc., 132, 134; Pom. Rem. Rem. Rights, secs. 171-173, 141; 22 Ency. P. P., 169; Bliss on Code P1., secs. 54, 262; Voohies' Code, 98; Waits' Ann. Code, 122; 76 S.C. 101; 41 S.C. 408. Messrs. Bonham, Watkins Allen, contra, cite: Is theaction properly brought? 76 S.C. 101; 27 Ency., 260, 265; 26 L.E. (U.S.), 1194; 37 Id., 1013; 80 U.S. 369; 160 U.S. 475; 36 S.C. 213; 41 S.C. 408; 13 Metc., 99. Objection of want of capacity to sue should be taken bydemurrer or answer: 81 S.C. 210; 80 S.C. 472; 77 S.C. 463; 65 S.C. 116; 47 S.C. 64; 76 S.C. 101. Plaintiffis not required to show negligence: 76 S.C. 101; 41 S.C. 414; 165 U.S. 611. October 12, 1909.