From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 2, 2011
No. C 09-1987 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 09-1987 CW.

November 2, 2011


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND AND TO STAY ENFORCEMENT, PENDING APPEAL, OF AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND NON-STATUTORY COSTS TO PLAINTIFF KIM MUNIZ (Docket No. 297)


On October 4, 2011, Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. filed a Motion for Approval of Supersedeas Bond and to Stay Enforcement, Pending Appeal, of Award of Attorneys' Fees and Non-Statutory Costs to Plaintiff Kim Muniz. On October 6, 2011, this Court took the motion under submission on the papers. On October 18, 2011, Plaintiff Kim Muniz filed a Statement of Non-Opposition to this motion.

The Court, having read and considered all of the papers submitted on this motion and the entire record in this action, hereby GRANTS Defendant's motion and ORDERS as follows:

1. That the supersedeas bond Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc., posted on October 4, 2011, for $1,500,000, is sufficient to cover the $697,971.80 judgment for attorneys' fees and non-statutory costs (plus any applicable interest) awarded to Plaintiff Kim Muniz on August 23, 2011 (Docket No. 292) (the "Attorneys' Fees Award").

2. That, based on the Court's approval of the supersedeas bond, the Court stays the enforcement of the Attorneys' Fees Award pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d).

3. That the stay is effective as of this date and shall remain in effect during the pendency of the appeal of the Attorneys' Fees Award (Ninth Circuit Docket No. 11-17282).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 2, 2011
No. C 09-1987 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KIM MUNIZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a corporation and…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Nov 2, 2011

Citations

No. C 09-1987 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)