From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muniz v. Subia

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 11, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-01373-MCE-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cv-01373-MCE-DAD P.

February 11, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 14, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 14, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's August 21, 2007 application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies.


Summaries of

Muniz v. Subia

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 11, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-01373-MCE-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Muniz v. Subia

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL MUNIZ, Petitioner, v. R. SUBIA, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 11, 2008

Citations

No. 2:07-cv-01373-MCE-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008)