From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muniz v. Saul

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 2, 2021
19 CIVIL 1103 (AEK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2021)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 1103 (AEK)

06-02-2021

BRANDON GIL MUNIZ, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated June 2, 2021, that this action be, and hereby is, remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), in connection with the Supreme Court's decision in Carr v. Saul, 141 S.Ct. 1352 (2021), in which the Court held that a claimant need not raise an Appointments Clause claim before the Social Security Administration, but may instead present it for the first time in federal court. On remand, the case will be assigned to a different administrative law judge (“ALJ”) to further evaluate plaintiffs claims, plaintiff will be offered the opportunity for a hearing, and the ALJ will issue a new decision.


Summaries of

Muniz v. Saul

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 2, 2021
19 CIVIL 1103 (AEK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Muniz v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON GIL MUNIZ, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 2, 2021

Citations

19 CIVIL 1103 (AEK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2021)

Citing Cases

Lawyer v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Indeed, this Court readily located a number of recent Social Security cases from this District where such…