From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muniz v. Ethicon, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 20, 2020
No. 3:20-cv-00852-AC (D. Or. Nov. 20, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:20-cv-00852-AC

11-20-2020

MARY MUNIZ, Plaintiff, v. ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [54] on September 16, 2020, in which he recommends that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation [54]. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 20, 2020.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Muniz v. Ethicon, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 20, 2020
No. 3:20-cv-00852-AC (D. Or. Nov. 20, 2020)
Case details for

Muniz v. Ethicon, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARY MUNIZ, Plaintiff, v. ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 20, 2020

Citations

No. 3:20-cv-00852-AC (D. Or. Nov. 20, 2020)