From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munitz v. Munitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1952
280 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

June 23, 1952.


In an action for judgment declaring plaintiff to be the wife of the male defendant and for incidental injunctive relief, order striking out a portion of the complaint pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. Even though the complaint may be insufficient to warrant injunctive relief, the allegation to the effect that such relief is sought cannot be struck out as irrelevant. The other allegations which were struck out serve to delineate the relationship of the parties and to bear upon the propriety of granting a declaratory judgment as well as to show the presence of complete jurisdiction in the courts of this State. Carswell, Acting P.J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Munitz v. Munitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 1952
280 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Munitz v. Munitz

Case Details

Full title:VIVIAN MUNITZ, Appellant, v. RAYMOND J. MUNITZ et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)