From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munir v. Thomas

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 25, 2009
No. CIV S-05-1996 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1996 MCE EFB P.

June 25, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's May 1, 2009, motion for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Munir v. Thomas

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 25, 2009
No. CIV S-05-1996 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Munir v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN MUNIR, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 25, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1996 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2009)