From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munger v. Calif. Fed. Sav. and Loan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 3, 1990
563 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-3451.

July 3, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gulf County; Philip J. Knight, Judge.

Joanne R. Day and Fred F. Harris, Jr., of Roberts, Baggett, LaFace Richard, Tallahassee, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Charles A. Costin of Costin and Costin, Port St. Joe, for appellee/cross-appellant Cal. Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n.

No appearance for appellees Richard T. Coley and Susan L. Coley.


We find that it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to set aside the mortgage foreclosure sale. See Maule Industries, Inc. v. Seminole Rock Sand Co., 91 So.2d 307 (Fla. 1956); Surratt v. Fleming, 322 So.2d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. denied, 336 So.2d 600 (Fla. 1976); Rosen v. Hunter, 224 So.2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).

Because it is not ripe for judicial review, we do not address the attorney's fee issue raised in appellee's cross appeal. See City of Tampa v. Fein, 438 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), receded from on other grounds, Crittenden Orange Blossom Fruit v. Stone, 492 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, NIMMONS and ALLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Munger v. Calif. Fed. Sav. and Loan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 3, 1990
563 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Munger v. Calif. Fed. Sav. and Loan

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MUNGER, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CALIFORNIA FEDERAL SAVINGS AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 3, 1990

Citations

563 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Calif. Fed. S L Assn. v. Coley

The same order found that Munger, although a non-prevailing party, was entitled to attorney's fees; there was…