From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mundy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 1, 2022
654 S.W.3d 438 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84951

11-01-2022

Mark A. MUNDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Mark Mundy, Charleston, MO, Appellant Acting Pro Se. Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.


Mark Mundy, Charleston, MO, Appellant Acting Pro Se.

Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Thomas N. Chapman and Janet Sutton, Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam: Mark Mundy appeals the Johnson County Circuit Court's dismissal of his pro se motion claiming abandonment by appointed post-conviction counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties explaining the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mundy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 1, 2022
654 S.W.3d 438 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Mundy v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mark A. MUNDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

654 S.W.3d 438 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)