From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulvey v. Berman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 2000
271 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted March 8, 2000.

April 20, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated May 28, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Frank V. Merlino, Garden City, N.Y. (David Holmes of counsel), for appellants.

White Cirrito, LLP, Hempstead, N.Y. (James P. Nally of counsel), for respondent.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In opposition to the defendants' motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff submitted sufficient evidence in the form of a chiropractor's affidavit to create a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see, Outcalt v. Wang, 269 A.D.2d 435 [2d Dept., Feb. 14, 2000]; Moreno v. Delcid, 262 A.D.2d 464).


Summaries of

Mulvey v. Berman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 2000
271 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Mulvey v. Berman

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MULVEY, respondent, v. LORETTA R. BERMAN, et al., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 20, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 344

Citing Cases

Savitt v. Wente

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. In opposition to the defendant's motion for summary judgment,…