From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Multimatic, Inc. v. Faurecia Interior Systems, USA, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 20, 2006
No. 05-60120 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 20, 2006)

Opinion

No. 05-60120.

September 20, 2006


ORDER


Before the Court are third-party DaimlerChrysler's Motion to Quash Subpoena [Docket #63] and Defendant Faurecia's Motion to Compel Deposition [Docket #64]. For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on September 19, 2006, DaimlerChrysler's Motion to Quash [Docket #63] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and Defendant's Motion to Compel [Docket #64] is DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. DaimlerChrysler will comply with Defendant's Rule 30(b)(6) subpoena only to the extent that its witness will testify as to the following topic, specified as topic no. 3:

"DCX VPM Program supplier conditions to access and use of the VPM system, including but not limited to any Technical Computer Center Agreement ('TCC Agreement') or other agreement or application for use by Multimatic, Inc., specifically concerning confidentiality of data on the VPM systems and ownership of designs within VPM."

In all other regards (i.e., as to topics 1, 2 and 4) Defendant's subpoena to DaimlerChrysler shall be quashed.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Multimatic, Inc. v. Faurecia Interior Systems, USA, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 20, 2006
No. 05-60120 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 20, 2006)
Case details for

Multimatic, Inc. v. Faurecia Interior Systems, USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MULTIMATIC, INC., Plaintiff, v. FAURECIA INTERIOR SYSTEMS USA, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 20, 2006

Citations

No. 05-60120 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 20, 2006)