From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullo v. DoorDash, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 2, 2022
22-CV-2430 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-2430 (VEC)

05-02-2022

JOSE REINALDO YUQUILEMA MULLO, SILVERIO FLORES, Plaintiffs, v. DOORDASH, INC., ERIN ANDEREGG, TONY XU, Defendants.


ORDER

VALERIE CAPRONI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

WHEREAS on April 8, 2022, Defendants moved to compel arbitration, Dkt. 10;

WHEREAS Plaintiff's response in opposition to the motion was due Friday, April 29, 2022, Dkt. 14; and

WHEREAS Plaintiff did not respond to the motion by the deadline.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's deadline to respond in opposition to the motion to compel arbitration is adjourned nunc pro tunc to Thursday, May 5, 2022. If Plaintiff does not respond by the deadline, the Court will consider the motion unopposed and will grant the motion. Defendants' reply in support of their motion is due no later than Friday, May 20, 2022.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mullo v. DoorDash, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 2, 2022
22-CV-2430 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Mullo v. DoorDash, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE REINALDO YUQUILEMA MULLO, SILVERIO FLORES, Plaintiffs, v. DOORDASH…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 2, 2022

Citations

22-CV-2430 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)