From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullis v. Mullis

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 15, 1971
180 S.E.2d 543 (Ga. 1971)

Opinion

26253.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 11, 1971.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 15, 1971.

Divorce. Bibb Superior Court. Before Judge Bell.

Gerald S. Mullis, for appellant.

Jones, Cork, Miller Benton, H. Jerome Strickland, for appellee.


Elizabeth Jean Allen Mullis filed an action for divorce from her husband Julius Melton Mullis, III, in the Superior Court of Bibb County, Georgia. The complainant was awarded a divorce, custody of the child, and child support. The defendant filed a motion for new trial on the general grounds and subsequently amended it by adding additional special grounds. The amended motion for new trial was overruled by the trial court. The defendant appeals. Held:

1. In his notice of appeal the appellant does not specifically appeal from the ruling on the amended motion for new trial nor does he enumerate the ruling as error. Each of his enumerations of error, however, complains of matters which were ruled on by the trial judge in the amended motion for new trial. This court in Tiller v. State, 224 Ga. 645 ( 164 S.E.2d 137) held: ". . . if such error is included in a motion for new trial, the ruling on the motion for new trial will become the law of the case unless on appeal the ruling on the motion for new trial in enumerated as error or the ruling on the motion for new trial is specifically appealed from in the notice of appeal. The mere showing in the notice of appeal of the date on which the motion for new trial was filed and ruled on is not sufficient." Since the law of the case is established by the ruling on the amended motion for new trial, the enumerations of error present no questions for review by this court.

2. The amendment to the enumerations of error filed in this court after the time allowed for filing enumerations of error can not be considered. Foskey v. Kirkland, 221 Ga. 773 (1) ( 147 S.E.2d 310); Arkwright v. State, 223 Ga. 768 ( 158 S.E.2d 370); Stith v. Hudson, 226 Ga. 364 ( 174 S.E.2d 892).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Felton, J., who concurs specially.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 11, 1971 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 15, 1971.


Summaries of

Mullis v. Mullis

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 15, 1971
180 S.E.2d 543 (Ga. 1971)
Case details for

Mullis v. Mullis

Case Details

Full title:MULLIS v. MULLIS

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Feb 15, 1971

Citations

180 S.E.2d 543 (Ga. 1971)
180 S.E.2d 543

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

13. An enumeration of error may not be amended after the time for filing has expired. Mullis v. Mullis, 227…

MacDonald v. MacDonald

Thus, such enumeration may contain only one error. See generally 5 CJS 100, Appeal Error, § 1254; 5 AmJur2d…