From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullins v. L H T 109 Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 20, 2022
22-CV-9967 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-9967 (RA)

12-20-2022

DERRICK MULLINS, Plaintiff, v. L H T 109 INC. d/b/a LIONS HEAD TAVERN and NOVUS INMOUILIARE INC., Defendants.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby:

ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and complaint, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the district's court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at this time.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) additional days (i.e., within forty-five (45)days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letterrequesting that the Court either (1) refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge (and indicate a preference between the two options), or (2) schedule an initial status conference in the matter.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mullins v. L H T 109 Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 20, 2022
22-CV-9967 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Mullins v. L H T 109 Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK MULLINS, Plaintiff, v. L H T 109 INC. d/b/a LIONS HEAD TAVERN and…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

Citations

22-CV-9967 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2022)