From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullins v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 29, 2008
1:07-cv-01162 AWI-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)

Opinion

1:07-cv-01162 AWI-TAG (HC).

February 29, 2008


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Doc. 12)


On February 28, 2008, Respondent filed a motion to modify the briefing schedule to extend the time for Respondent to file a motion to dismiss Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 12). On February 28, 2008, Respondent also filed a motion to dismiss and lodged the documents alleged to support the motion, with the Court. (Docs. 9, 11). The Court has considered Respondent's motion to modify the briefing schedule, finds that good cause exists to grant it, and makes the following order:

1. Respondent's motion to modify the briefing schedule is GRANTED (Doc. 12);

2. The briefing schedule (Doc. 6) is modified to extend the time for Respondent to file a motion to dismiss, to February 28, 2008;

3. Respondent's motion to dismiss and supporting documents filed on February 28, 2008 (Docs. 9, 11), are deemed timely filed; and

4. This order is made nunc pro tunc to February 28, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mullins v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 29, 2008
1:07-cv-01162 AWI-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Mullins v. Horel

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JEROME MULLINS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN ROBERT HOREL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 29, 2008

Citations

1:07-cv-01162 AWI-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)