From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 28, 1989
553 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-2129.

November 28, 1989.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Theodore G. Mastos, Judge.

Carl Mullings, in pro. per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Giselle D. Lylen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before COPE, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.


Appellant, Carl Mullings, appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the order of the trial court based upon a holding that the motion was untimely filed; and the issues raised therein were procedurally barred and/or without merit. Rose v. State, 472 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 1985); Zeigler v. State, 452 So.2d 537 (Fla. 1984); Brown v. State, 430 So.2d 446 (Fla. 1983); Ford v. State, 407 So.2d 907 (Fla. 1981); Ponder v. State, 530 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Paez v. State, 512 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Williams v. State, 473 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).


Summaries of

Mullings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 28, 1989
553 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Mullings v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARL MULLINGS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 28, 1989

Citations

553 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Wilcox v. State

Therefore, the action of the trial court should be affirmed. See Elkins v. State, 555 So.2d 441 (Fla. 3d DCA…