Opinion
Argued April 27, 1896
Decided May 26, 1896
Henry A. Monfort for appellant.
Thomas S. Moore and Charles C. Nadal for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Mulligan v. Crimmins
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 26, 1896
44 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1896)
Summaries of
Mulligan v. Crimmins
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 26, 1896
44 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1896)
Case details for
Mulligan v. Crimmins
Case Details
Full title:MICHAEL MULLIGAN, Appellant, v . JOHN D. CRIMMINS, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 26, 1896
Citations
44 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1896)
44 N.E. 1129
Citing Cases
Martin v. Mfg. Co.
Black's Law and Practice in Accident Cases, section 8. (267) In Mulligan v. Crimmins, 82 N.Y. 578, it is…
Cook v. Railway Co.Of course, if the master furnishes a tool known to be defective, or which inspection and test ought to…