From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muller v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 29, 2006
No. CIV. S 05-1390 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV. S 05-1390 GEB GGH PS.

August 29, 2006


ORDER


On August 2, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion to amend the amended complaint. The motion was not accompanied by a proposed amended complaint, and was not noticed for hearing on this court's law and motion calendar. Therefore, it must be vacated.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint, filed August 2, 2006, is vacated. Plaintiff may renew his motion if it is accompanied by a proposed amended complaint, and is properly noticed for hearing. E.D. Local Rule 78-230.


Summaries of

Muller v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 29, 2006
No. CIV. S 05-1390 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Muller v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department

Case Details

Full title:HENRY JOHN MULLER, III, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 29, 2006

Citations

No. CIV. S 05-1390 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)