From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muller v. Raskind

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1928
142 A. 918 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Decided May 14th, 1928.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Messrs. Lintott, Kahrs Young, for the respondents.

Messrs. Levy, Fenster McCloskey and Mr. Charles Jones, for the appellants.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N.J. Eq. 258. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Muller v. Raskind

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1928
142 A. 918 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Muller v. Raskind

Case Details

Full title:ANTON F. MULLER et al., respondents, v. ISAAC RASKIND et al., appellants

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 14, 1928

Citations

142 A. 918 (N.J. 1928)
142 A. 918
103 N.J. Eq. 21

Citing Cases

Siesel v. Mandeville

Where, however, the contract calls for the bond and mortgage of the vendee, he cannot liberate himself of…

Carluccio v. 607 Hudson St. Holding Co., Inc.

" When parties contract for personal liability, a vendee may not arbitrarily substitute another's liability.…