From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muller v. Peterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1901
57 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)

Summary

In Muller v. Peterson (57 App. Div. 626) a judgment had been recovered against the defendant personally on a note similar to the one herein on the theory that he was personally liable on the face of the note notwithstanding the addition of the word "trustee" to his signature.

Summary of this case from Megowan v. Peterson

Opinion

January Term, 1901.


Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on authority of Olpherts v. Smith ( 54 App. Div. 514). All concurred, except Sewell, J., taking no part.


Summaries of

Muller v. Peterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1901
57 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)

In Muller v. Peterson (57 App. Div. 626) a judgment had been recovered against the defendant personally on a note similar to the one herein on the theory that he was personally liable on the face of the note notwithstanding the addition of the word "trustee" to his signature.

Summary of this case from Megowan v. Peterson
Case details for

Muller v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:Conrad Muller, Respondent, v. Charles G. Peterson, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1901

Citations

57 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)

Citing Cases

Megowan v. Peterson

The question whether the defendant is personally liable for the obligation assumed by him as trustee in the…

Megowan v. Peterson

May Term, 1901. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the law and facts, upon the authority of Muller…