From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muller v. Parish

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Jun 3, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3362 SECTION "N"(4) (E.D. La. Jun. 3, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3362 SECTION "N"(4).

June 3, 2010


ORDER


The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Henry Muller's claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the defendants, St. Tammany Parish, St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office, St. Tammany Parish School Board, District Attorney Walter Reed, Northshore High School, James Scott Winther (Sr.), James Scott Winther, Jr., and Shannon Michelle Winther, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous, for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted, and/or for seeking relief against an immune defendant, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Muller's § 1983 claim of malicious prosecution are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(b). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Muller's § 1983 claims against the defendants, Jason M. Mire, Keith J. Schenck, and Mark Oster, for illegal search and seizure and falsifying police reports and affidavits, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(b), until such time as the conditions set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994) are met.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to FRCP Rule 12(e) (Rec. Doc. No. 13) filed by the St. Tammany Parish School Board; the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. No. 19) filed by St. Tammany Parish; Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. No. 20) filed by St. Tammany Parish District Attorney Walter Reed; the Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. No. 30) filed by Jason Mire, Keith Schenck, Mark Oster, and the St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office; and the Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. No. 35) filed by James Scott Winther (Sr.), Shannon Michelle Winther, and James Scott Winther, Jr. are DISMISSED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Muller's claims, if any, raised under Louisiana law, against the defendants, St. Tammany Parish, St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office, St. Tammany Parish School Board, District Attorney Walter Reed, Northshore High School, James Scott Winther (Sr.), James Scott Winther, Jr., Shannon Michelle Winther, Jason M. Mire, Keith J. Schenck, and Mark Oster, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the Court declines to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction.

New Orleans, Louisiana.


Summaries of

Muller v. Parish

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Jun 3, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3362 SECTION "N"(4) (E.D. La. Jun. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Muller v. Parish

Case Details

Full title:HENRY MULLER v. ST. TAMMANY PARISH, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: Jun 3, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3362 SECTION "N"(4) (E.D. La. Jun. 3, 2010)

Citing Cases

St Julien v. Gov't of Iberia Par.

Rather, he must identify a Parish policy, practice or custom which caused the damage he asserts in the manner…