From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muller v. Muller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Summary

In Coe v. Muller, 74 Fla. 399, 77 So. 88, the court held that the repeal of usury laws without a saving clause operates retrospectively so as to cut off the defense of usury for the future, even in actions upon contracts previously made.

Summary of this case from Cloone v. Minot Building & Loan Ass'n

Opinion

June, 1934.

Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.


Motion for reargument denied.


Summaries of

Muller v. Muller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

In Coe v. Muller, 74 Fla. 399, 77 So. 88, the court held that the repeal of usury laws without a saving clause operates retrospectively so as to cut off the defense of usury for the future, even in actions upon contracts previously made.

Summary of this case from Cloone v. Minot Building & Loan Ass'n
Case details for

Muller v. Muller

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH COE MULLER v. EMIL A. MULLER

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Yaffee v. International Company

Thirdly, the contention of the appellee, at least insofar as it urges that the contract was illegal at the…

Staros v. Avalon Shores, Inc.

Such being the case, the penal provisions of the statute, including the provision for forfeiture of both the…