From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muller v. Farmingdale Individual Laundry Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 29, 1951
279 App. Div. 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

October 29, 1951.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.


In an action to recover brokerage commissions, plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits at the close of his case. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, plaintiff failed to prove any definite agreement as to the terms essential to the contract claimed, and accordingly failed to establish that the minds of the parties met, and that he was entitled to commissions. (Cf. Stern v. Bristol Corp., 273 App. Div. 371, affd. 298 N.Y. 766; Arnold v. Schmeidler, 144 App. Div. 420, 427.)


Summaries of

Muller v. Farmingdale Individual Laundry Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 29, 1951
279 App. Div. 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Muller v. Farmingdale Individual Laundry Service

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD J. MULLER, Appellant, v. FARMINGDALE INDIVIDUAL LAUNDRY SERVICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)