From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullen v. Texas and Pacific Railway Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 3, 1970
425 F.2d 269 (5th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 28006.

April 3, 1970.

J. Barnwell Phelps, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Fritz H. Windhorst, Frederick P. Heisler, Kent A. Russell, New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before GEWIN, GODBOLD and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


Armand E. Mullen filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana for injuries received while a passenger on The Texas and Pacific Railway. The jury awarded Mullen $50,000 in damages and the railroad appeals contending: (1) Mullen failed to prove that his injuries were proximately caused by the negligence of the railroad. (2) Mullen was guilty of contributory negligence. (3) The trial court erred in failing to grant a judgment notwithstanding the verdict based on the testimony of the only independent eyewitness to the accident. After careful consideration of the parties' contentions, as set forth in the briefs and advanced upon oral argument, and a perusal of the record, we are firmly convinced that this case presents a typical factual dispute as to the negligence of the railroad and the contributory negligence of Mullen. These questions were properly presented to the jury and resolved against the railroad. We find nothing in the record which would cause us to upset the jury's verdict.

See Grey v. First National Bank in Dallas, 393 F.2d 371, 380-381 (5 Cir., 1968); Blount Brothers Corp. v. Reliance Insurance Co., 370 F.2d 733, 739 (5 Cir., 1967). See also, United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948).

When the evidence in support of a jury's verdict is sufficient to sustain the verdict, and no error of law is disclosed, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment should be affirmed in a brief opinion.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Mullen v. Texas and Pacific Railway Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 3, 1970
425 F.2d 269 (5th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

Mullen v. Texas and Pacific Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:Armand E. MULLEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 3, 1970

Citations

425 F.2d 269 (5th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

Castilleja v. Southern Pacific Company

It would add nothing of precedential value to engage in a further extended review and analysis of all the…

Abernathy v. Southern Pacific Company

Rather it reaffirms our belief that when the evidence in support of a jury's verdict is sufficient to sustain…