From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulle v. Stiefel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 20, 1972
267 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-1101.

September 20, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart F. LaMotte, Judge.

A.N. Spence, Miami, for appellant.

James A. Scott, of Saunders, Curtis, Ginestra, Gore, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.


Our review of this appeal leads us to conclude that in the interest of justice, the final judgment should be reversed and the appellant accorded a new trial in light of Hutchison v. Tompkins, Fla.App. 1972, 259 So.2d 129 — which was decided after the final judgment was rendered. On remand, the trial court shall permit the parties to make such amendments to their pleadings as they may be advised.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

REED, C.J., and WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mulle v. Stiefel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 20, 1972
267 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Mulle v. Stiefel

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER J. MULLE, APPELLANT, v. EARL R. STIEFEL AND GERTRUDE M…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 20, 1972

Citations

267 So. 2d 38 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)