From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulkey v. Montana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
Mar 1, 2018
CV 17-93-BU-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. Mar. 1, 2018)

Opinion

CV 17-93-BU-DLC-JCL

03-01-2018

MELVIN RICHARD MULKEY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent.


ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered his Order and Findings and Recommendations on January 8, 2018, recommending Petitioner Melvin Richard Mulkey's habeas petition be dismissed as unexhausted. (Doc. 4 at 5.) Petitioner failed to timely object to the Findings and Recommendations and so has waived the right to de novo review thereof. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Absent objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted).

After reviewing for clear error and finding none,

IT IS ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Order and Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 4) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

1. The Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED as unexhausted.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter by separate document a judgment in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DATED this 1st day of March, 2018.

/s/_________

Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Mulkey v. Montana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
Mar 1, 2018
CV 17-93-BU-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. Mar. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Mulkey v. Montana

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN RICHARD MULKEY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 1, 2018

Citations

CV 17-93-BU-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. Mar. 1, 2018)