From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulford v. Inch

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Sep 29, 2021
No. 1D20-943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 29, 2021)

Opinion

1D20-943

09-29-2021

Walter Mulford, Petitioner, v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Walter Mulford, pro se, Petitioner. Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, and Daniel R. Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari-Original Jurisdiction.

Walter Mulford, pro se, Petitioner.

Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, and Daniel R. Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So.2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Ray, Jay, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mulford v. Inch

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Sep 29, 2021
No. 1D20-943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Mulford v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:Walter Mulford, Petitioner, v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department…

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Sep 29, 2021

Citations

No. 1D20-943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 29, 2021)