From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muldoon v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

December, 1935.


Order denying defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to the commencement of an action at law for money damages. We are of opinion that the allegations of the complaint not only fail to set forth facts showing the existence of a partnership, but that it affirmatively appears therefrom that the plaintiff was nothing more than an employee or agent working on a commission based upon the gross volume of business procured, without any interest in the so-called partnership assets or possible profits. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Muldoon v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Muldoon v. Klein

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. MULDOON, Respondent, v. ARTHUR KLEIN and KLEIN'S SHIP SUPPLIES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1935

Citations

246 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Jones

aintiff has commenced an action for an absolute divorce; that because of defendant's misconduct and his…