From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muka v. Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 690 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Submitted March 26, 1984

Decided May 1, 1984


Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the grounds that a direct appeal does not lie where questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (CPLR 5601, subd [b], par 2) and where the constitutional questions involved are not substantial, and upon the further ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon appellant's default (CPLR 5511).


Summaries of

Muka v. Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 690 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Muka v. Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust

Case Details

Full title:BETTY O. MUKA, Appellant, v. HANCOCK, ESTABROOK, RYAN, SHOVE HUST et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 1, 1984

Citations

62 N.Y.2d 690 (N.Y. 1984)
476 N.Y.S.2d 536
465 N.E.2d 43