From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.[fn*
Nov 16, 1981
662 F.2d 1110 (5th Cir. 1981)

Opinion

Nos. 80-7546, 81-2011.

November 16, 1981.

Edward Still, Birmingham, Ala., Neil Bradley, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Leitman, Siegal Payne, P.A., Eddie Leitman, Andrew P. Campbell, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellees.

Theodore D. Frank, Washington, D.C., for Public Broadcasting Service, amicus.

Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Pat Bailey, Houston, Tex., for defendants-appellants.

Marjorie S. Reed, Daniel M. Armstrong, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Linda Oliver, FCC, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae FCC.

David H. Berg Associates, Philip Zelikow, David Berg, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; J. Foy Guin, Jr., Judge.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 514 F. Supp. 670; Gabrielle K. McDonald, Judge.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, JR., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK, WILLIAMS and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.

Chief Judge Godbold recused himself and, therefore, did not participate in this decision.



[1] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion September 21, 1981, 5 Cir., 1981 656 F.2d 1012). [3] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [4] (Opinion October 30, 1981, 5 Cir., 1981 660 F.2d 137).


A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that these causes shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these causes be consolidated for rehearing and disposition by the Court en banc.


Summaries of

Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.[fn*
Nov 16, 1981
662 F.2d 1110 (5th Cir. 1981)
Case details for

Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission

Case Details

Full title:DONALD E. MUIR, H. JEFF BUTTRAM, AND O. NAVARRO FAIRCLOTH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.[fn*

Date published: Nov 16, 1981

Citations

662 F.2d 1110 (5th Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

MUIR v. ALA. EDUCATIONAL TEL. COM'N

September 21, 1981. Rehearing En Banc Granted November 16, 1981. See 662 F.2d 1110. Edward Still, Birmingham,…

Casey v. Public Service Commission

Accordingly, we shall rely upon the technical knowledge of the FCC and PSC in determining that it is not…