From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suk Hay Mui v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 1996
226 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 11, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.).


The CPLR 325 (d) transfer was proper given the indication that plaintiff's damages may be less than Civil Court's jurisdictional limit, namely, the settlement of plaintiff's children's claims for $2,250 each and the absence of any evidence that plaintiff's injuries were more severe. In any event, CPLR 325 (d) provides that "[i]f the action is so removed, then the verdict or judgment shall be subject to the limitation of monetary jurisdiction of the court in which the action was originally commenced". We have considered plaintiff's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Suk Hay Mui v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 1996
226 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Suk Hay Mui v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:SUK HAY MUI, Appellant, v. ROBERT G. MILLER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 534

Citing Cases

Global Bus. Inst. v. Rivkin Radler LLP

Accordingly, plaintiff has failed to provide a sufficient factual basis to substantiate defendant's…

Villafane v. 600 West 178th Street, LLC

Thus, plaintiff failed to provide a sufficient factual basis to refute the original assessment of damages.…