From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhonen v. Academy

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT
Jan 27, 2016
874 N.W.2d 243 (Minn. 2016)

Opinion

No. A15–1239.

01-27-2016

Leanda MUHONEN, Relator, v. NEW HORIZON ACADEMY and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Respondents, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, UCare, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, and Medical Advanced Pain Specialists, Intervenors.

Leanda Muhonen, Chanhassen, Minnesota, pro se. Matthew C. Kopp, Kelly R. Rodieck & Associates, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for respondents.


Leanda Muhonen, Chanhassen, Minnesota, pro se.

Matthew C. Kopp, Kelly R. Rodieck & Associates, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on July 1, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/____________________

David L. Lillehaug

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Muhonen v. Academy

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT
Jan 27, 2016
874 N.W.2d 243 (Minn. 2016)
Case details for

Muhonen v. Academy

Case Details

Full title:Leanda Muhonen, Relator, v. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity…

Court:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

874 N.W.2d 243 (Minn. 2016)