From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhlon v. Surf Operating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1998
255 A.D.2d 370 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action ( see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment ( see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when she tripped and fell on a public sidewalk in front of premises owned by the defendant Surf Operating Co., and leased to the defendant Somachs Home Improvements.

In the absence of evidence that an abutting landowner made special use of a public sidewalk or created or caused an allegedly defective condition, the property owner is not liable for injuries sustained by an individual who falls on the sidewalk ( see, Hand v. Stanper Food Corp. 250 A.D.2d 812; Hinkley v. City of New York, 225 A.D.2d 665; Landau v. Town of Ramapo, 207 A.D.2d 384; Mendoza v. City of New York, 205 A.D.2d 741). In the instant case, the defendants offered evidence that they had not done anything to create or cause the alleged defective condition of the sidewalk, and that they made no special use thereof. Accordingly, the court properly granted the respective motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Muhlon v. Surf Operating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1998
255 A.D.2d 370 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Muhlon v. Surf Operating Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE MUHLON, Appellant, v. SURF OPERATING CO. et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 370 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 705

Citing Cases

Kent v. City of N.Y

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all…

Elias v. City of New York

The court erred, however, in denying the motion of the codefendant Bayberry Greens Associates (hereinafter…