From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 29, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-85-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-85-KRG-KAP

10-29-2013

CARLOS MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Defendants


Memorandum Order

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.S 636 and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on October 10, 2013, docket no. 30, recommending that the defendants' motion to dismiss, docket no. 25, be granted.

The plaintiff was notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S 636(b)(1), he had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff has not filed objections and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record and the Report and Recommendation, and noting the absence of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2013, it is

ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss, docket no. 25, is granted and the complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.

BY THE COURT:

___________________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:

Carlos Muhammad CA-8079

S.C.I. Somerset

1600 Walters Mill Road

Somerset, PA 15510


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 29, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-85-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 29, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-85-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2013)