Muhammad v. State

Full title: Jamaal MUHAMMAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Feb 25, 2014

421 S.W.3d 585 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 100187.

2014-02-25

Jamaal MUHAMMAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Thomas C. Grady, Judge. Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Karen Louise Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Thomas C. Grady, Judge.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Karen Louise Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamaal Muhammad (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).