From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Stansberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 7, 2008
268 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-7543.

Submitted: February 28, 2008.

Decided: March 7, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-hc-02077-H).

Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Stansberry, No. 5:07-hc-02077-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Stansberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 7, 2008
268 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Stansberry

Case Details

Full title:Abdul-Aziz Rashid MUHAMMAD, v. Petitioner-Appellant, Patricia R…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 7, 2008

Citations

268 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2008)