From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 27, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-75 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-75 Erie.

March 27, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on March 4, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7], filed on March 10, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition [Doc. No. 1] be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Defendant. Petitioner filed objections [Doc. No. 8] on March 24, 2006. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Petition [Doc. No. 1] is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on March 10, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 27, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-75 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:MUJADDID R. MUHAMMAD, Petitioner, v. JAMES F. SHERMAN, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 27, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-75 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2006)