From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Foulk

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 26, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-131 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 26, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-131 Erie.

October 26, 2005


ORDER


This matter has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636 (b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation filed October 5, 2005, recommended that Plaintiff's "Motion for Preliminary Prohibitory Injunction Restraining Order" (Doc. 41) and his "Preliminary Prohibitory Injunction Restraining Order" (Doc. 45) be denied. The parties were allowed ten(10) days from the date of service to file any objections. Service was made on all parties. Plaintiff has filed objections to the report and recommendation.

After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation and Plaintiff's objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, to-wit, this 26th day of October, 2005, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter dated October 5, 2005 be and hereby is adopted as the Opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Documents 41 and 45 be and hereby are DENIED.


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Foulk

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 26, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-131 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 26, 2005)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Foulk

Case Details

Full title:BUWLUS A. MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. D.A. BRAD FOULK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 26, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-131 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 26, 2005)