From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Camp

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 7, 2023
2:21-cv-01477-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01477-TLN-DB

02-07-2023

ANSAR EL MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. G. CAMP, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that Defendants opened his legal mail outside his presence and failed to refer his grievance to internal affairs for further investigation. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 5, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 5, 2022, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Camp

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 7, 2023
2:21-cv-01477-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Camp

Case Details

Full title:ANSAR EL MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. G. CAMP, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 7, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-01477-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)