From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Armfield

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 22, 2024
Civil Action 24-2553 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 22, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-2553

11-22-2024

WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD v. JAMES ARMFIELD, AL MILES, WILBUR JONES, JAMES CLARK, BARRY MOORE, DENNY GREEN


ORDER

MURPHY, J.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November 2024, upon independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (DI 2), after review of Judge Carlos's Report and Recommendation (DI 9), petitioner's objections (DI 10-19), and for reasons in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (DI 9) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. We OVERRULE the petitioner's objections (DI 10-19).
3. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the supplemental motion (DI 1, 21) are DENIED as moot.
4. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (DI 2) is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice.
5. There is no basis to issue a certificate of appealability.
6. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Armfield

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 22, 2024
Civil Action 24-2553 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Armfield

Case Details

Full title:WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD v. JAMES ARMFIELD, AL MILES, WILBUR JONES, JAMES…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 22, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 24-2553 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 22, 2024)