From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muckleroy v. Davis

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Mar 2, 2023
6:22-cv-00150 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2023)

Opinion

6:22-cv-00150

03-02-2023

Rodney Muckleroy, Plaintiff, v. Quade Davis et al., Defendants.


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Rodney Muckleroy, a prisoner confined within the Texas prison system proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell.

On January 12, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. 26, 27, 29, 32) be granted and that the case be dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 37. A copy of this report was sent to plaintiff at his last-known address. No objections were filed.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. 26, 27, 29, 32) are granted and this case is dismissed with prejudice. All pending motions are denied.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Muckleroy v. Davis

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Mar 2, 2023
6:22-cv-00150 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Muckleroy v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:Rodney Muckleroy, Plaintiff, v. Quade Davis et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Mar 2, 2023

Citations

6:22-cv-00150 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2023)