From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muck v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 19, 2024
4:23-CV-00604-BSM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 19, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-CV-00604-BSM

09-19-2024

MICHAEL W. MUCK PLAINTIFF v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Martin O'Malley, Commissioner DEFENDANT


ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore's recommended disposition [Doc. No. 12] is adopted, the commissioner's decision is reversed, and this case is remanded to permit the commissioner to develop the record. Although it is close, there is not substantial evidence in the record to support the Administrative Law Judge's decision. On remand, the ALJ is directed to supplement the record with medical evidence, such as an opinion from a medical provider, that would address whether Michael Muck would qualify for benefits absent his substance abuse.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Muck v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 19, 2024
4:23-CV-00604-BSM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Muck v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL W. MUCK PLAINTIFF v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Martin…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 19, 2024

Citations

4:23-CV-00604-BSM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 19, 2024)